Tuesday, April 15, 2014

FRACKING: Not everyone agrees with our positon.



So we've spent many hours to produce the image above. First we assembled, then we posed, and then we did the post production, including purchasing the copyright of frack pad image. Many hours work. We got the idea from Lambeth Greens.

Just as local Greens are about to use the image, I spotted something hilarious. The gentleman furthest to the right in the background is indicating his displeasure, at our principled stance, by cupping his hand in the orthodox 'merchant banker' gesture - in our direction! Well I never!

Tags ,

Sunday, April 06, 2014

Croydon Green Party Manifesto 2014

Please click on and zoom in to read. The image is a high resolution so it can be enlarged. If not the text is below. THE GREEN PARTY - FOR THE COMMON GOOD





Croydon Green Party 2014 Manifesto


1/ Referendum on the incinerator
We oppose the toxic incinerator and will hold a referendum to let residents decide
whether to go ahead with the incinerator. Our alternative is to increase recycling 
by offering incentives to residents, and making it easier and cheaper for businesses, 
charities, schools and places of worship to recycle. 
2/ Save green spaces – No to fracking
Croydon’s parks and woods are for relaxation. Only the Green Party will oppose 
all exploration for gas and oil in our green spaces and under our homes. Hydraulic
fracturing will contaminate ground water, increase the risk of earth tremors and 
industrialise our green spaces.
3/ Dealing with knife crime
Croydon Council, police, residents, and community groups such as charities and 
churches need to work together to combat knife crime. Young people need 
alternatives to gang culture: youth clubs, martial arts, music, sport offer positive 
activities for self-development and enhancing job prospects
4/ Building homes
Croydon needs more affordable social housing whilst protecting green spaces. 
Developments shouldprioritise local residents, not speculative investment, and 
include a suitable mix of reasonably priced accommodation. Tenants in privately
rented housing should be protected from excessive rent levels.
5/ Safer streets
We will consult with local residents on a 20mph limit for all residential roads in 
Croydon. This lower speed limit reduces the casualties from road accidents by 
40%.We will also retain lollipop persons at strategic crossings in order to encourage 
walking to school.
6/ Bike lanes
Croydon has a poor record of investment in cycling, and a low level of cycling. 
The Croydon Green Party would encourage cycling by creating a network of 
safe cyclelanes, cycle friendly streets and routes through parks to help to reduce 
pollution, improve health and provide a faster way to travel.
7/ Fly tipping
This must be tackled robustly by better co-ordination of council staff and police,
publicising a free phone hotline to report fly-tipping, swift removal of rubbish, 
scrapping the collectioncharge forheavy items including mattresses, and the prosecution
of offenders.
8/ Fair pay Croydon
We support the London Living Wage campaign and call on local employers including
Croydon Council and their contractors to implement the London Living Wage for all 
employees. In addition, Croydon Council should establish a 10:1 maximum pay ratio for
council employees.
9/ Preventing flooding
Better planning is needed to avoid flooding and deal with it if necessary. The Council 
must ensure developers prioritise flood resilience and prevention in new buildings, and 
include Climate Change adaptations in existing buildings. Local planning rules need 
strengthening to raise energy efficiency.
10/ Public services
We support high-quality public services run for people not profit. We will maintain the
Council Tax in line with inflation to protect services such as libraries and social care, 
and encourage arts events.   We will also involve residents in decision making e.g. through 
 public meetings and social media.

 Tags ,


Friday, March 28, 2014

Croham select



This is the first post - no doubt of many - which will cover the 2014 elections. The picture above was taken at Lloyd Park. Tracey Hague, Gordon Ross and yours truly have been selected for Croham ward. Croham is our target ward. Without any effort Greens finished third in the 2012 elections behind Conservatives and Labour in this ward so we're quite excited about our prospects given canvassing is going really well.

Tags ,

Sunday, March 16, 2014

First response to my fracking letter.

Letters Page Croydon Guardian


Labour - more specifically Waddon Labour Party - are the first to respond to my letter that appeared in the Croydon Guardian. Full version below.

Am I the only one that thinks that this is similar to how the Tories promised not build an incinerator?? Labour nationally are pro- fracking but after initially claiming to be against "urban fracking in Croydon", Waddon Labour are now saying that the "Labour Party in Croydon is opposed to fracking". The stakes are high, especially in Waddon - the top swing ward in the borough. Labour members are now publicly asking Greens not to stand in Waddon to ensure pivotal votes don't go to the Green party. Here is an example. Ostensibly, is it possible that Labour will say anything to win crucial votes to win Waddon ward? After all, there is a precedent. #waddonconservativecouncillors

24.02.2014

Dear Editor

This is an open letter to the Conservative, Labour, Lib Dem and UKIP parties in Croydon. Polls show that only half the country is in favour of shale gas extraction, otherwise known as fracking in the UK. Yet, the only party opposed to fracking in the UK is the Green party. Moreover, through talking to people on the doorstep, I have found that nearly all residents in favour of fracking have second thoughts if the well to be fracked is near where they live. Additionally, they cannot comprehend Croydon council approving such an application, but again have second thoughts when reminded the Prime Minister is changing planning law to monetarily reward councils for each successful well. What I have also found is that hardly anyone is aware that one of the very few exploratory fracking licenses to be granted in the UK, including the only one within the M25, covers a belt across the middle of Croydon.
Given the risks associated with drilling vertically for 1-2 miles and then horizontally for 1 mile, followed by pumping water, sand and a concoction of chemicals into the well at very high pressure, the other political parties in Croydon need to be clear, upfront and honest about their position. So the question I ask the other parties is: Will your local party defy national policy and join us in opposing all fracking applications in Croydon?

Yours sincerely

Shasha Khan
Croydon Green Party




--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

Friday, February 21, 2014

ATOS protest in Croydon


Feb 19th - Outside Stephenson House, Cherry Orchard Road - ATOS Assessment Centre


As part of a national day of protest local Greens joined others outside Stephenson House. Ironically, one end of Stephenson House is a gym and the entrance is signposted with the words Fitness Club (above), and fitness (to work) is ATOS' raison d'etre..

There is a strange thing about the psychology of this country is that people intrinsically focus on those that appear to be getting away with it who are below them on the income scale, rather than the economic and political elite above them who have become even richer thanks to policies under Labour and Tories.

The solution is a Citizens Income (CI). Everyone should be given a weekly or monthly income as of right that is unconditional and unrecoverable, that allows them to enjoy at least a modest standard of living. We already have similar universal benefit - child benefit. CI could be easily started, at no extra cost, by scrapping personal income tax allowance and tax credits. The benefits to society are numerous. I found a good account of CI here.

There were some imaginative posters and placards including the one below which is the perimeter boarding of a building site further down Cherry Orchard Road.




The 'Before I die I want to________' boarding seems to be popping up all over London.

I think many went up to ATOS hq in central London because the Croydon protest was thin on the ground. Definitely more police than protesters. Those that were in attendance had a leftist slant it could be said!

I met Dave Plummer from Lewisham Green Party at the protest and he produced this rather fine video.




Further coverage here on the Croydon Guardian web site.
--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

ATOS Protest in Croydon tomorrow (Feb 19th)



Front and back of flyer




I picked up this flyer from a busker on George Street. He had been subject to what sounded a horrific ATOS medical. I have heard of many such accounts on the radio. Local Greens will be joining the protest.
--------------------------------------------------

Tags ,

National Flood planning to help local residents in Kenley

130 people were evacuated from their homes
15 Fire Engines as far as Hemel Hempstead brought in to pump water around the clock 


18.02.2014

Press Release on floods: immediate

The UK’s response to the flooding crisis must centre on a long-term strategy to address climate change the Green Party says today, as it recommends a series of ten measures (1) to improve the country’s flood resilience in future.
It says sustained political action on climate change is crucial to reducing the risk of severe flooding happening again.
The Party is calling for Environment Secretary Owen Paterson to be sacked and for the Prime Minister to remove Cabinet Ministers and senior government officials who refuse to accept the scientific consensus on climate change. The Met Office (2) has said that the evidence points to climate change contributing to these extraordinary floods.

Tracey, Hague, co-leader of the Croydon Green Party, said:
“These floods, which have left cars submerged and homes evacuated in Kenley, bring into focus the devastating risk of inaction on climate change.
We need to do all we can right now to help those affected by flooding, including applying to the EU for extra financial help. In the longer term we must reverse staff cuts at the environment agency and strengthen planning rules to prevent further development on flood plains.”

The Green Party’s ten point plan on flooding includes:
1. Reverse staff cuts at the Environment Agency, review its budget, and drop plans to impose a duty on the EA to consider economic growth which could get in the way of providing independent expert advice
2. Strengthen planning rules for urban and rural areas to prevent further development on flood plains and ensure developers prioritise flood resilience and prevention – including through incorporation of SUDS in new developments as well as a programme of retrofitting SUDS to existing communities. Ensure better transparency of decisions so public can hold decision makers accountable.
3. Get rid of any cabinet Ministers or senior governmental advisors who refuse to accept the scientific consensus on climate change or who won’t take the risks to the UK seriously

Natalie Bennett, Green Party Leader, said:
“Politicians who ride roughshod over the painstaking findings of climate scientists (3), sometimes motivated by their inappropriately close links to fossil fuel big business, endanger our future and our children’s future”
“It’s a crying shame more of the recommendations made by the The Pitt Review into the 2007 floods (4) haven’t been taken seriously by Labour, the Tories, and their Coalition government lackeys in the Lib Dem Party. But it is not too late for action.”

Caroline Lucas, the Green Party MP for Brighton Pavilion, said:
“Across the country, homes and businesses are being devastated by the floods, and our hearts go out to everyone whose life is being turned upside down. Nature is giving us another wake-up call.
“In addition to making sure everything possible is done to help people affected by the immediate crisis, we need a credible long term strategy to tackle the risk of flooding and extreme weather to people’s homes and livelihoods in the future.”
The call to government urges ministers to adopt the recommendations of a major independent cross sector coalition for a Cabinet-level committee on infrastructure and climate change resilience and a Royal Commission on the long-term impacts of climate change on land.
The Green Party is also calling for all staff cuts at the Environment Agency to be cancelled, planning rules to be strengthened to prevent further development on flood plains, and for increased levels of spending on flood defences to a level in line with expert recommendations from the Environment Agency and the Climate Change Committee.
And it is supporting the call of campaigners for the billions of UK fossil fuel subsidies and tax breaks to be used to help the victims of flooding
“This redirection will address the underspend and assist the victims of flooding, as well as putting a halt to public money exacerbating the problem of climate change that is making the floods so much worse”, noted Bennett.
ENDS

2)     http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26084625#sthash.kT1ZfplV.dpuf

--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,


Thursday, February 13, 2014

DRUGS POLICY press release has just come through from HQ

Caroline Lucas – we’ve achieved a major step towards a humane drugs policy
Brighton Pavilion MP’s petition for a review of drug laws reaches 100,000 signatures
For immediate release: Thursday 13 February, 2014
The Green MP Caroline Lucas today hailed a major step towards a humane,  evidence-based drugs policy as her petition for a review of drug laws reached the 100,000 mark.
With support from tens of thousands of people across the country, including Russell Brand, Richard Branson, drug policy experts, and the campaign community Avaaz, the petition hit 100,000 signatures this morning.  This means that Lucas’ call for an independent assessment of the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act will be debated in Parliament.
Caroline Lucas, MP for Brighton Pavilion, said:
“The Misuse of Drugs Act is hopelessly out of date.  It has never been reviewed, or undergone a cost-benefit analysis.  In England and Wales alone, an estimated £3billion a year is spent fighting the war on drugs, to little effect.  Over half of the people in prison are thought to have serious drug problems, and yet we continue to fail to treat drug addiction as the serious health problem it is.
“I’m absolutely delighted that so many people have sent a clear message to the Government that we need a fresh approach. Today we have achieved an enormous step towards an evidence-based drugs strategy.”
Notes to Editors
1)      View the E-petition here:  http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/45969
2)      Facts and figures about the UK’s drug laws
The Costs of Drug Use
·         The most recent (for the year 2003/04) Home Office estimate of the annual social and economic cost of Class A drug use in England was £15.4 billion,[i]
·         The most recent Home Office research estimated that between a third and a half of all acquisitive crime is committed by offenders who use heroin, cocaine or crack cocaine. There are no equivalent figures for Class B and Class C drug use. [ii]
·         An estimated £4.036 billion of the cost of drug-related crime is the criminal justice costs of arresting, prosecuting and imprisoning drug users. [iii]
·         The remainder are ‘victim costs’ of crime It is estimated that fraud accounts for more than a third of Class A drug-related crime costs, totalling £4.888 billion. [iv]
·         Burglary accounts for more than a quarter of the cost at £4.07 billion followed by robbery at £2.467 billion and shoplifting at £1.197 billion.  The cost of drug-related arrests is £535 million [v]
·         The research by the Government into the total economic and social costs of drug use failed to include the cost of the drug strategy itself, which according to the 2002 drug strategy was £1.344 billion in 2003/04.  This budget was spent on prevention, enforcement of drugs laws and treatment [vi]
·         Therefore, the charitable think tank Transform estimates the total cost of Class A drug use (heroin and cocaine) under prohibition in England and Wales in 2003/04 was £16.785 billion.  [vii]
·         A 2013 study which evaluated the costs and benefits of introducing a licensed and regulated marijuana market in England and Wales concluded that the most plausible result of reforming marijuana’s legal status would be a net benefit of £100-£415 million and that, additionally, the tax intake would be £400-£900 million.[viii]
·         Over half of the people in prison are thought to have serious drug problems.[ix]
·         Rates of cannabis use by young people in Britain are amongst the highest in Europe.[x]
·         Across England and Wales, only around 7% of drug stop and searches end in arrest.  As a result of almost 550,000 stop and searches for drugs in 2009/10, only 40,000 people were arrested, wasting police time and resources [xi]
An Evidence Based Approach
·         There has never been an impact assessment of the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act.
·         Nor has there been a cost benefit assessment, or any attempt to compare its effectiveness in reducing the societal, economic or health costs of drug misuse with alternatives, such as decriminalisation of drug use.
Decriminalisation
·         The legal status of drugs has little effect on people’s decision to use them, as research by the Journal of Substance Use has shown [xii]
·         An investigation by the drug charity Release in 2012 looked at 21 jurisdictions that had adopted some form of decriminalisation of drug possession.  Overwhelmingly, the research showed that such an approach does not lead to an increase in drug use and that, by not criminalising those who use drugs, there were improved outcomes in terms of employment and relationships, reduced stigma, and people were less likely to enter or re-enter the criminal justice system, creating significant financial savings [xiii]
·         The UN Office on Drugs and Crime admits that the war on drugs has had terrible ‘unintended’ consequences[xiv]





[viii] https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/d/153
[ix] http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmhaff/184/18409.htm
[x] http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/2116.pdf
[xiii] http://www.release.org.uk/sites/release.org.uk/files/pdf/publications/Release_Quiet_Revolution_2013.pdf
--------------------------------------------------
Tags ,

FAIR IS WORTH FIGHTING FOR